The Jessup Compromis for 2013 has been released!
The Compromis deals with four interlinked issues. Firstly, whether a state can continue to exist if it has no defined territory. Secondly, whether the treatment and proposed transfer of refugees complied with international refugee law and finally, whether the seizure of state funds deposited with a bank in the other territory is in compliance with international law.
All of these look like intriguing topics, and especially the first one seems to be a rather unique question that squarely frames the question of whether the Montevideo criteria continue to apply after the recognition of states. Of course, sovereignty without territory has existed in international law for various specific entities. Whether that’s a general idea that extends to all sovereign entities is an intriguing question.
Good luck to everyone who decides to participate!